Collaborating
better with channel partners
A
perspective on Distributor Management Systems (DMS) in Indian CPG industry
Rajesh Bhambani (Managing
Consultant – IBM Global Business Services) - March 2016
1. Abstract
The
Indian consumer packaged goods (CPG) industry is faced with an ever increasing
pressure to achieve greater agility in serving the market. In order to maintain
this competitive edge, organizations have augmented their focus to improve
collaboration with channel partners as part of their go-to market strategy. An
effective Distributor Management System (DMS) is a critical pre-requisite to
meet this objective .Traditionally DMS were meant for distributors to undertake
basic transactions like billing and collection. However, the industry has moved
towards advanced solutions that enable business with; increased market
visibility to drive supply chain efficiencies and greater sales force
automation to improve sales execution.
Fig 1. Expectations from a modern DMS
While upgrading the existing DMS to achieve
advanced functionality is a clear direction that is taken by most CPG organizations,
whether to move to an online DMS (a centralized architecture) which drives greater
business benefits or to retain the exiting offline DMS (a distributed
architecture) is a thought with which many organizations are still grappling
with. Despite its benefits, the tentativeness to move to an online solution is
driven primarily by the apprehension of not having a reliable internet
connectivity throughout the country, which can ensure distributor operations to
run online without any risk of business disruption.
This
paper endeavors to present a perspective on the various architecture options
for a distributor management system (DMS) and associated pros and cons for each
of these options.
Fig 2. Offline DMS Architecture
2.
DMS architecture options
DMS architecture can be decentralized or
distributed which works in offline mode or centralized which works in online
mode.
- a. Decentralized architecture (offline DMS): Traditionally, DMS deployment in CPG industry has been in a decentralized architecture. A decentralized architecture or an offline architecture has three major application components.
- Central console; hosted centrally and is integrated with other enterprise applications. It is used to create master data specific to the distributor and manage master data received from other systems. It also acts as a conduit for sending transactions like primary sales, goods in transit and credit notes to distributor application & receiving/ assimilating distributor billing, claims and other transaction data
- Distributor application, hosted on each distributors’ local machine (a separate application instance), is used to perform transactions of billing, inventory management, beat planning, salesman management, etc. in an offline mode. The data interchange between distributor application & central console takes place when distributor application goes online (connect to internet) and syncs data. In the process of syncing, distributor application is updated with data like the schemes, primary invoices and master data like product, price, etc. The central console in turn receives the secondary sales data, claims, and other desired transaction data from the distributors. A key limitation of this architecture is the dependence of the principal organization on the distributor to get online to receive secondary sales data and to keep the distributor application updated with schemes, prices, products etc.
- Mobility Application- Hand held device (HHD): The distributor sales force carries the HHD to retail outlet to capture orders, perform collection, record returns and perform other sales and merchandising activities. The data sync between HHD and distributor application is performed typically through a wireless local area network (WLAN) at distributor premises. A key limitation of this architecture is that the salesman has to be physically present at distributor premises in order to sync the HHD data with the distributor application thereby reducing the productive time spent by the salesman in the field.
b. Centralized architecture (online DMS): Unlike the decentralized architecture, in a centralized architecture there is no need for
Fig 3: Online DMS Architecture
Offline DMS
|
Online DMS
|
§ Business operations
can continue without being connected to central console, hence:
ü No risk of business
disruption due to internet outages.
ü No dependence on
internet connectivity for the distributor to carry out core business
transactions.
ü No performance
issues due to poor/weak internet connectivity
|
§ Real time and
accurate visibility of distributor
stocks and secondary sales
§ Improved sales force
efficiency:
ü Salesforce need not
visit distributor premises for HHD data sync.
ü Enhanced HHD
assistance through real time visibility to inventory, target achievements.
§ No issues occurring
due to lag in applying schemes, price revisions etc. to the market
§ Improved business
monitoring through an online beat tracking and payment collection reconciliation.
§ Distributor need
not maintain local data base and application
§ Easy to maintain
and quick roll out of business changes.
|
§ Lesser visibility
of in market stock and inventory
§ Reduced sales force
efficiency.
§ Latency in master
and transaction between central console and distributor.
§ Cumbersome
maintenance and greater time required
to rollout business changes
|
§ Dependence on a
continuous and reliable internet connectivity to carry our distributor
operations
§ Business disruption
in case of internet outages.
§ Possible
application performance issues in case of weak internet bandwidth.
|
c. Partially centralized architecture (partially online DMS)
Figure 4: Partially
Centralized Architecture
A partially centralised architecture is a smarter way of achieving many
a benefits of an online system without needing a continuous and reliable
internet connectivity. Although this architecture compel the distributor to
sync data at least once a day, however it reduces the risk of business
disruption as business transactions can be undertaken offline.
3. Conclusion
Although the benefits of a completely online system
are clearly recognised, the apprehension of not having a reliable internet
connectivity across the nation, have left the organisations grappling with the
decision of whether to go for a completely online DMS or to retain the existing
offline solution.
A few CPG organisations however, have already acted as
first movers and have successfully deployed a completely online DMS and have
been able to reap its benefits to gain a competitive advantage in the
marketplace. Yet, there is another set of organisations who are upgrading to
advanced functionality but are choosing to retain offline architecture as they
do not want to take any chance that may potentially lead to a business
disruption.
There are also thoughts around an architecture, which
can be termed as a hybrid DMS solution. This means to have a DMS solution in
which, for the same organisation, a set distributor work in an online mode
(locations where a reliable internet connectivity can be ensured) and the rest
of the distributors can continue work in an offline. This kind of an
arrangement besides being technically too complex to achieve and maintain, the
fact that there is a choice provided to a set of distributors to remain offline
defeats the very purpose of having an online solution.
While the debate of an on-line vs. an offline DMS continues, the future trend is clearly pointing towards moving to a completely on-line (centralized) architecture. This is also supported by the fact that the internet penetration in remote locations of India is rapidly increasing. Further, smart application designs make them light enough to be performing well even on low bandwidth internet connections (like a 2G /3G data card) thus reducing the need to necessarily have a high speed broadband connectivity. Keeping these factors into consideration it is evident that the deterrents for moving on to an online system are fast diminishing. As a way forward organizations should look at means/alternatives to manage operations for locations where reliable internet connectivity could be a challenge, rather than choosing to keep the entire distributor function offline.
No comments:
Post a Comment